"In the ancient Church the fullness of the office resided in the Bishop. He was responsible within the community for both the office of faith and the office of love. To assist him in the office of faith, there were the presbyters, his fellow pastors. With his blessing, they could preach, teach, and even celebrate the Eucharist. To assist him in the office of love, there were the deacons. They were charged with the care of the poor, those in prison, the needy, and providing for the clergy. Through both the office of faith and the office of love, the hope that is in Christ was imparted, strengthened, and manifested."As a Lutheran, I am taught that church government is adiaphora. I have been taught that Jesus and the Apostle’s DID NOT institute any specific form of government for the church and that we in the LCMS are free to have the form we currently use.
However, it is interesting to read Rev. Weedon’s final comments on his blog post:
"The diaconate is waiting for recovery among us. It is a fair question whether it CAN be recovered without the recovery of the bishop - the man who embodies the fullness of both offices - as well; I honestly don't know. But that we Reformation Christians have been guilty of neglecting the office of love is, I would think, beyond dispute. And I find it highly significant that in its liturgical expression the deacon in his office of love is the one who both gathers, presents and administers the offerings of the people and who bids their prayers. Love in action: in giving and in praying very visibly in the Sunday assembly, and out from the altar goes the service of love. We Reformation Christians need this office to return to its own place among us. Our communities suffer for its lack."
1 comment:
Steven,
If you are interested in doing so, please feel free to email me on this matter. I would like to share with you my experiences as a Lutheran when I brought this up, but only in a non-public setting.
Blessings in Christ,
Adam
ajr276 at gmail dot com
Post a Comment